Judge Forces Doctors to Perform Abortions Regardless of Their Moral or Religious Objection

A federal judge on Wednesday blocked the Trump administration from enforcing a proposed rule designed to allow health care workers to cite moral or religious reasons for not participating in abortions.

Judge Paul A. Engelmayer of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York said the rule was too heavy-handed because it linked the policy to aid that could be withheld from health care providers unless they complied with the rule, NBC News reported.

(Content Continues Below)

“Wherever the outermost line where persuasion gives way to coercion lies, the threat to pull all HHS funding here crosses it,” Engelmayer wrote, according to Reuters, calling the rule “arbitrary and capricious.”

He also said the Trump administration’s argument that there was a vast number of cases to justify the rule was wrong.

“Where H.H.S. claimed that the rule was justified by complaints made to it, the administrative record reflects a yawning evidentiary gap,” he wrote.

RELATED:  Comedian Joe Rogan Puts Trans Movement on Blast, Defends Female Athletes

In its reporting on the case, The New York Times included a snippet of discussion between Engelmayer and a Justice Department lawyer during oral arguments.

Engelmayer had posed the hypothetical question of what might happen if an ambulance driver with objections to abortion was transporting a pregnant woman through Central Park but learned she was planning to end an ectopic pregnancy.

“The driver tells her to get out in the middle of the park?” Engelmayer said.

Engelmayer, who worked for the Department of Justice during the administration of former President Bill Clinton, was appointed to his post by former President Barack Obama.

The case consolidated lawsuits from New York City, New York state and Planned Parenthood.

“The refusal of care rule was an unlawful attempt to allow health care providers to openly discriminate and refuse to provide necessary health care to patients based on providers ‘religious beliefs or moral objections,’” New York Attorney General Letitia James said in response to the ruling.

RELATED:  Christian Persecution is Out of Control in Asian Countries

“Today’s decision is an important victory against the Trump administration’s cruel and unlawful attempts to roll back critical patient protections,” Alexa Kolbi-Molinas, senior staff attorney for the Reproductive Freedom Project at the American Civil Liberties Union, told NBC.

The Bold Conservative Comments

Jack Davis

Contributor, News at Western Journal
Jack Davis is a freelance writer who joined The Western Journal in July 2015 and chronicled the campaign that saw President Donald Trump elected. Since then, he has written extensively for The Western Journal on the Trump administration as well as foreign policy and military issues.
Jack Davis